scribblings

The Following post was an article written by the owner of this blog for 'The Sabre', the Narmada Hostel Magazine in 2002, his freshie year. For people who resided in Narmada during that period, it would probably be very easy to guess the context in which it was written. Of course it was published with tonnes of grammatical errors and alignment problems and misplacing of pieces of text and all that could ruin it. I am actually amazed to see its relavance even now. With no further build-up, here it is
----------------------------------------
This article is not written with any intention to hurt the feelings of any person or any group of people but is written to be read in a lighter sense.

"The level" as a definition can be taken as "the level". It can be explained as the amount of maturity and class in your activities and in the way you look at and do them.

"The level" of a good number of people amongst us is quite alarming when realised as "the level" in those people is so low that it is not explainable as my conscience says to me. They dont know what to speak, when to speak, how to speak or where to speak. (It is left to the readers choice as to include other words of question to analyze "the level" of a person). The ultimate irony is that they consider their "level" to be that of studs but they dont realise that they belong to a different class of people all together.

For those of you who seek examples, just think of a few recent meetings or seminars or lectures you attended and you certainly would have come across umpteen number of examples of people who belong to "the level" yourself.

These people do things in a very outtax fashion and try to impress people and do impress quiet a large number of audiences. By doing so they are able to attain heights but actually lack "the level" in them and hence is "the level" of their activities.

Those people who get attraced by the people who belong to the "the level" are (I dont know what to say) all very immature and their "the level" is far below than those whose "the level" mentioned perviously in the article.

The race of people whose "the level" is not definable are those who get the greatest attention as the big shots all over and today's world is in a pitiable "level" because of the people who belong to "the level" and supported by those who lack "the level" and "the level" of those in whose hands is the world today is in.

It is left to the reader of this article to raise their "level" and gain a maturity and class in their lifestyle and aso as to see some amount of improvement and class in their work and also for the second lot to not to go behind people of "the level" unless they have raised their "levle" and be clear to select people who have certain amount of "class"

If atleast one person realises about the pity of "the level" and tries to raise himself to some "class", I think that would serve the purpose of writing this article though I would welcom more people to raise their "level" and get into drastic measures so as to see greater improvement and leading to the greater good of your life and also that of those around you.

The last paragraph is not meant to be taken in a lighter sense as "the level" of most of the people who read this is to reduce "the article" itself to "the level"
------------------------------------